MOHD AMIRUL HASSAN AHMAD TAJUDDIN vs USAS BERHAD (UNIVERSITI SULTAN AZLAN SHAH)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Petitioner Advocates:Marwan Abdullah ,Respondent Advocate: Mohammed Miran Mohammad Salip

Table of Content
1. alleged unfair dismissal of claimant. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. claimant asserts permanent contract disguised as fixed-term. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. company argues validity of fixed-term contracts. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. company bears burden of proof in dismissal cases. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
5. determining genuine nature of fixed-term contracts. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
6. factors for assessing intention behind contract. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
7. court addresses contract interpretation principles. (Para 39 , 40 , 41)
8. nature of dismissal requires probing into just cause. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
9. fixed-term contracts terminate automatically at expiration. (Para 48 , 49 , 50)
10. claimant's dismissal not unfair; contract ended. (Para 51 , 52 , 53)
11. court evaluates intention of employment contract. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)
12. legitimate expectation under employment law clarified. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62)
13. claimant's expectations unsupported; contract nature clear. (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66)
14. allegations of victimization not substantiated. (Para 67 , 68 , 69)
15. burden of proof rests on