Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
KEMAS MAJU CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MASTER CRAFT GROUP SDN BHD & OTHER CASE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the dispute and its background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of the adjudication proceedings initiated by master craft. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. outline of applications made by both parties. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. summary of kemas maju's arguments against the adjudicator's decision. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. court's analysis of the natural justice issues raised. (Para 32 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. findings on the adjudicator's considerations and limitations. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 46) |
| 7. court's position on jurisdictional challenges. (Para 49 , 52 , 53) |
| 8. misapplication of previous case principles by kemas maju. (Para 57 , 58 , 62 , 64) |
| 9. court's dismissal of kemas maju's stay application. (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71) |
| 10. conditions for master craft's enforcement of the adjudication decision. (Para 74 , 75) |
A. Introduction
[1] On August 2024, Master Craft Group Sdn Bhd (Master Craft) had commenced an Adjudication Proceedings pursuant to the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA 2012) against Kemas Maju Sdn Bhd (Kemas Maju) to claim a sum of RM1,389,572.92 as the unpaid sum. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
