Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
FORTUNE HALLMARK SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TWIN RIDGE SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties entered into a contract. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. deposit and sales targets detailed. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. plaintiff claims for deposits and outstanding payments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. defendant counters with breach allegations. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. trial evidence overview. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. court analyzes contractual breaches. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. defendant's arguments on documentation fail. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. testimonies considered as hearsay lack credibility. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 9. court recognizes plaintiff’s obligations. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 10. court cites precedent for rights under contracts. (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 11. disputed whatsapp communication analyzed. (Para 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86) |
| 12. court finds an agreement concerning payments. (Para 101 , 102 , 103 , 104) |
| 13. plaintiff awarded recovery of debts. (Para 106 , 107) |
(After Trial)
Introduction
[1] This case involves a claim arising out of a breach of contract ("this Case") filed by Fortune Hallmark Sdn Bhd ("the Plaintiff") against Twin Ridge Sdn bhd ("the Defendant").
Brief Facts Of The Case
[2] The Plaintiff is a marke
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
