SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 2684

HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
YCE PRESTIGE MANAGEMENT PLT & ORS – Appellant
Versus
TAN BENG HIN & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiffs filed for defamation suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. criteria for granting interim injunction. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. damages as an adequate remedy instead of injunction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. balance of justice favors d1. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
5. china press published to warn against fraud. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
Quay Chew Soon J:

Introduction

[1] On 9 May 2025, the Plaintiffs filed the instant suit against the Defendants. The Plaintiffs' cause of action against the Defendants is based on defamation.

[2] Eleven days later, on 20 May 2025, the Plaintiffs filed an application in encl 4 for an ex parte interim injunction against the Defendants. Enclosure 4 is made under O 29 of the Rules of Court 2012.

[3] On 22 May 2025, I dismissed encl 4. Here are my reasons.

Interim Injunction

[4] Via encl 4, the Plaintiffs seek the following order:

"1) Satu perintah injunksi interim bahawa Defendan Pertama dan Defendan Kedua sama ada dengan diri sendiri, ejen-ejen atau pekerja-pekerjanya atau dengan apa jua cara lain, daripada terus menyiarkan sebarang kenyataan yang membawa maksud dan / atau bererti kepada maksud kenyataan fitnah terhadap Plaintif-plaintif sama ada secara ternyata

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top