HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
YCE PRESTIGE MANAGEMENT PLT & ORS – Appellant
Versus
TAN BENG HIN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs filed for defamation suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. criteria for granting interim injunction. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. damages as an adequate remedy instead of injunction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. balance of justice favors d1. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. china press published to warn against fraud. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
Introduction
[1] On 9 May 2025, the Plaintiffs filed the instant suit against the Defendants. The Plaintiffs' cause of action against the Defendants is based on defamation.
[2] Eleven days later, on 20 May 2025, the Plaintiffs filed an application in encl 4 for an ex parte interim injunction against the Defendants. Enclosure 4 is made under O 29 of the Rules of Court 2012.
[3] On 22 May 2025, I dismissed encl 4. Here are my reasons.
Interim Injunction
[4] Via encl 4, the Plaintiffs seek the following order:
"1) Satu perintah injunksi interim bahawa Defendan Pertama dan Defendan Kedua sama ada dengan diri sendiri, ejen-ejen atau pekerja-pekerjanya atau dengan apa jua cara lain, daripada terus menyiarkan sebarang kenyataan yang membawa maksud dan / atau bererti kepada maksud kenyataan fitnah terhadap Plaintif-plaintif sama ada secara ternyata
Keet Gerald Francis Noel John v. Mohd Noor @ Harun Abdullah & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.