TIONG SING CHIONG vs KETUA PENGARAH INSOLVENSI

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 MarsdenLR 2883

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TIONG SING CHIONG – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH INSOLVENSI – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Charlotte Jennifer Thomas ,Respondent Advocate: Nurul Azeannie Jamian Dom

Table of Content
1. application for injunction and declarations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. facts surrounding applicant's bankruptcy and property. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. contentions of applicant and respondent regarding the property. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. issue regarding property vesting post-discharge. (Para 15)
5. analysis of insolvency laws regarding discharge and property. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
6. legal observations on the registration of property post-discharge. (Para 27 , 28)

Suzana Muhamad Said JC:

Introduction

[1] This is an application by the Applicant seeking:

1) Satu injuksi deklarasi bahawa Responden tiada sebarang hak kepada syer Pemohon sebanyak 1/18 atas tanah yang dipegang di bawah Sibu Lease 45865, TRN: 03-SSL-000-000, 45865, Area 1.2019 Ha more or less, Locality of Land Bukit Lima, Sibu pada ketika ini. (selepas ini dirujuk sebagai "Hartanah tersebut");

2) Satu perintah injuksi interim bahawa Responden ataupun ejen-ejen mereka dihalang daripada memasuki premis hartanah tersebut, ataupun menjual/mencagar/memindah hakmilik kepada pihak ketiga; dan selepas pendengaran secara Inter-Partes satu perintah injunksi mutlak;

3) Bahawa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2025 MarsdenLR 2883

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURTIONG SING CHIONG – AppellantVersusKETUA PENGARAH INSOLVENSI – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TIONG SING CHIONG – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH INSOLVENSI – Respondent