HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
NEWARA SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
JOHOR LAND BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mutual obligations under consent order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. factual basis for the legal dispute. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. arguments over time extension for application. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. judicial discretion to extend compliance timelines. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. extension of time granted with conditions. (Para 31 , 32) |
(Enclosure 30)
Introduction
[1] The plaintiffs' action against the defendant herein is primarily for a declaration that certain agreed terms established through exchange of letters between both parties' solicitors in February 2021 (the "agreed terms") are valid, binding and enforceable against each of them and as a consequential thereof an order for specific performance for the defendant to fulfill their obligations according to the said agreed terms.
[2] On 28 December 2023, the plaintiffs and the defendant had reached an amicable settlement where by way of a Consent Order ("CO"), it was recorded among others that the plaintiffs agreed to make an application for an extension of the lease tenure of their lands to the Land Office within 2 months from
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.