Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
VIMALA MARUTHAMUTHOO – Appellant
Versus
PAUL MONASH NARAYANASAMY; KAVITAH VATHUMALAI (PROPOSED INTERVENER) (ENCLS 1 .... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of the property sale and caveats (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 2. principles of intervention in legal proceedings (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. assessment of proposed intervener's legal interest (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. evaluation of proposed intervener's claims (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
Introduction
[1] Enclosure 6 is the application filed by the Proposed Intervener, one Kavitah a/p Vathumalai, seeking leave to intervene in the Plaintiff's application under encl 1.
[2] In encl 1, the Plaintiff seeks to remove the private caveat lodged by the Defendant, one Paul Monash a/l Narayanasamy, over the property held under Geran 339999, Lot 126483, Mukim Dengkil, Daerah Sepang, Negeri Selangor, bearing the address No 2, Jalan Kananga 1/10, Taman Kenanga, 43900 Sepang, Selangor Darul Ehsan (the Property).
Background Facts
[3] On 11 April 2023, the Plaintiff entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement (the Agreement) with the registered proprietors of the Property for a total consideration of RM550,000.00 (the Purchase Price).
[4] At the material time, the Property was jointly owned in three equal shares by the following indivi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
