Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
AHMAD KHAIRUDIN ABDUL RAHIM & ORS – Appellant
Versus
DATUK BANDAR KUALA LUMPUR & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review application for klcp 2020 (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. overview of the planning authority and procedure (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. draft klcp preparation process (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. adoption and gazetting of revised klcp (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. submission of claims by applicants (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. alleged deviations impacting applicants' rights (Para 19 , 21) |
| 7. judicial review on the klcp's legality (Para 22 , 23) |
| 8. public interest litigation considerations (Para 25 , 26) |
| 9. definitions of locus standi in public law (Para 32 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. compliance with statutory requirements (Para 37 , 38) |
| 11. dbkl's procedural compliance defenses (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 12. importance of objections and representations (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 13. relation of development orders to planning principles (Para 51 , 62) |
| 14. final remarks on consistency with prior case law (Para 63) |
Introduction
[1] This is an application for judicial review challenging the legality of the Kuala Lumpur City Plan 2020 ("KLCP 2020"), which is the local plan for the City of Kuala Lumpur (also known as the Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2020 or KLLP 2020). The sole determination for this court was
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
