Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
TEONG PEEK MENG – Appellant
Versus
ONG CHUN KIM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for caveat removal (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. three-prong test for caveatable interest (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. beneficiary status does not confer caveatable interest (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal standards for caveat applications (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. insufficient evidence for allegations of forgery (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 6. legal grounds for removal of caveat (Para 14 , 17) |
| 7. balance of convenience favors removal (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
Introduction
[1] This judgment pertains to the plaintiff's application for the removal of a private caveat lodged by the defendant, the plaintiff's mother, over land registered under Pajakan Hakmilik Sementara Daerah No 2766, PT 367 in Mukim Tanah Rata, Cameron Highlands, Negeri Pahang. The application is made pursuant to s 327 of the National Land Code (" NLC "). It is also noteworthy that the Plaintiff filed a similar application to remove another private caveat lodged by the Plaintiff's brother, over the same property. That application was also heard together with this application and it is registered under Originating Summons No: AA-24NCvC-286-06/2024 [Teong Peek Meng v. Teong Peck Joo [2025] MLRHU 187].
Background Facts
[2] The decease
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
