SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 3687

MAHKAMAH SESYEN KLANG
DATO SERI SHANMUGAM RAMASAMY LWN. ADIVISAN VERASAMY


Petitioner Advocates:Dinesh Ganesan,Mathan Raj ,Respondent Advocate: Maligaa Radhakrishnan

Table of Content
1. nature of the financial transaction (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. circumstances around the monetary exchange (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. defendant's perspective on the funds (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. burden of proof in legal claims (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. probative value in the plaintiff's claim (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
6. conduct relevant to credibility (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
7. plaintiff’s background relevance (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
8. need for formal documentation (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
9. societal awareness of loan agreements (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
10. importance of written agreements (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52)
11. long opportunity for agreement (Para 53 , 54 , 55)
12. examination of documentary evidence (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66)
13. final ruling on the plaintiff's claim (Para 67 , 68 , 69)
Zulqarnain Hassan HMS:

Latar Belakang

[1] Plaintif/pemberi wang memfailkan rayuan terhadap penghakiman oleh Mahkamah yang menolak tuntutannya terhadap defendan/penerima wang setelah bicara penuh.

[2] Plaintif memohon defendan membayar RM234,900.00 kepadanya atas dakwaan ia adalah pinjaman persah

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top