Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
DATO SERI TIMOR SHAH RAFIQ – Appellant
Versus
NAUTILUS TUG & TOWAGE SDN BHD AND ANOTHER APPEAL; AZIMUTH SHIP MANAGE.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. parties' respective positions on intervention (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. court's analysis of asm's right to intervene (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. assessment of the bimco agreement's relevance (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 5. necessity of joining asm for binding effect (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 6. judicial efficiency arguments considered (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 7. prematurity of substantive arguments (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
| 8. conclusion on the intervention application (Para 67) |
[1] Before the court is an application by a ship management company to intervene in proceedings where a minority director seeks leave to commence derivative proceedings against the company's majority directors and the ship manager regarding allegedly unsubstantiated increases in ship management fees. The application raises the question of whether a putative defendant in intended derivative proceedings should be permitted to intervene at the leav
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
