Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
BANK PEMBANGUNAN MALAYSIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
SIDQI AHMAD SAID AHMAD & ORS (ENCLS 2 44 106 179 714 730) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of financial transactions and context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 12) |
| 2. arguments regarding the necessity of discovery orders. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 3. court analysis on the legitimacy of discovery based on fraud. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. interpretation of procedural barriers based on previous agreements. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 5. evaluation of the probative value of findings. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 6. legitimacy of payments as per financial records versus evidence. (Para 51 , 52 , 56 , 57) |
| 7. identifying additional wrongdoers- rationale for discovery. (Para 59 , 60 , 62 , 68) |
| 8. discovery in complex financial fraud cases. (Para 71 , 72 , 73 , 74) |
| 9. defendants' separation from original transactions does not exempt them. (Para 104 , 105 , 106) |
| 10. conclusion supporting the discovery application. (Para 113 , 115) |
[1] This is an application by the Plaintiff, Bank Pembangunan Malaysia Berhad, for discovery orders against Malayan Banking Berhad ("Maybank") and Maybank Islamic Berhad ("Maybank Islamic") to obtain banking records of the 4th Defendant, Roslina Binti Ibrahim ('Roslina"), th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
