Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SUE LYE CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BRILLIANT LTP CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD & ANOTHER CASE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of payment claim process. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. disputes raised by parties in adjudication. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. adjudicator's findings on legal arguments. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. summarization of adjudication decision outcomes. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. bltp's grounds for setting aside decision. (Para 25 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. comparison with anas construction case. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 8. legal reasoning and decision differentiation. (Para 34 , 39 , 42) |
| 9. identified errors and impact on adjudication. (Para 61 , 62 , 64) |
| 10. court's rationale for enforcement of decision. (Para 66 , 68 , 70) |
| 11. concluding orders and judgments. (Para 73 , 74) |
Introduction
[1] By Originating Summons No: WA-24C-163-10/2024 ("OS 163"),Sue Lye Construction Sdn Bhd ("SLC") is applying under s 28 of the Construction Industry Payment And Adjudication Act 2012 ("Act") to enforce an Adjudication Decision dated 15 September 2024 made in Adjudication Reference No: AIAC/D/ADJ-5363-2024 ("Adjudication Decision") which it obtained against Brilliant LTP Builders Sdn Bhd ("BLTP").
[2] By Originating Summons No: W
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
