HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
KENSINGTON GROUP MANAGEMENT LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DATO CHEW HUN SENG – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for security for costs (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations of breach and counterclaims (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. defendant’s arguments against the plaintiff (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. legal provisions on security for costs (Para 14 , 17) |
| 5. court's analysis of the arguments (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. decision to dismiss the application (Para 25) |
Introduction
[1] The present matter relates to an application in encl 47 by the Defendant (in the Main Action) for security for costs. The reliefs sought by the Defendant in encl 47 are as follows:
1. The Plaintiff to pay RM250,000.00 as security for costs to the Defendant within 7 days from the date of order;
2. The proceedings to be stayed until the payment of RM250,000.00 is made;
3. The proceedings to be dismissed in the event the Plaintiff fails to pay RM250,000.00;
4. Costs to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant.
The Overriding Issue
[2] The key issue in this application is whether this is a proper case for this Court to exercise its discretion to invoke O 23 of the Rules of Court 2012 and order the Plaintiff to provide security for costs.
The Main Action And The Countercla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.