Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
GIIB HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
GLOMAXES LATEX GLOVE MANUFACTURER SDN BHD & ANOTHER CASE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applications under the cipaa for adjudication. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 11) |
| 2. grounds for setting aside an adjudication decision. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. natural justice and procedural fairness. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. excess of jurisdiction in adjudication. (Para 16 , 21 , 25) |
| 5. definition and scope of construction work. (Para 18 , 20 , 22) |
| 6. discretion of the court in enforcement of adjudication. (Para 28 , 38 , 40) |
| 7. final orders for os 153 and os 162. (Para 45 , 46 , 48) |
Introduction
[1] By Originating Summons No: WA-24C-153-10/2024 ("OS 153"), GIIB Healthcare Products Sdn Bhd ("GIIB Healthcare") is applying under ss 15(b) and (d) of the Construction Industry Payment And Adjudication Act, 2012 ("Act") to set aside an Adjudication Decision dated 7 November 2022 made in Adjudication Reference No: AIAC/D/ADJ-4372-2022 ("Adjudication Decision") which Glomaxes Latex Glove Manufacturer ("Glomaxes") obtained against it.
[2] By Originating Summons No: WA-24C-162-10/2024 ("OS 162"), Glomaxes is applying under s 28 of the Act to enforce the Adjudication Decision against GIIB Healthcare as if it is a judgment or order of the High Court.
[3] As a matter
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
