HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CHEN JIN QUAN – Appellant
Versus
TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD – Respondent
Introduction
[1] In this judgment, the parties were referred to as they were designated before the trial court. This is an appeal by the defendant. The appeal arose from the decision of the Magistrate's court which found in favour of the plaintiff. The learned Magistrate allowed the plaintiff's claim with costs.
[2] The focus of this appeal concerned the question of whether the defendant's identity had been unlawfully misused to open an account with the plaintiff for the supply of electricity. It further raised the question of whether the Magistrate's court had correctly evaluated and appreciated the evidence presented during the trial.
[3] Upon examining the record of appeal and considering the submissions from both learned counsel, I allowed the appeal. The plaintiff was not satisfied and appealed against the decision.
Brief Background Facts
[4] The plaintiff was a licensed electricity supply provider. On 19 November 2018, an account for electricity supply bearing the number 6143-210110304702 ("Impugned TNB Account") was registered under the defendant's name. This account was associated with the premises located at No. 15-1, Lorong Batu Nilam 3A, Bandar Buk
International Times & Ors v. Leong Ho Yuen
Letchumanan Chettiar Alagappan @ L Allagappan & Anor v. Secure Plantation Sdn Bhd
Azman Mahmood & Anor v. SJ Securities Sdn Bhd
RHB Bank Bhd v. Dominance Timber Industries Sdn Bhd & Ors and Another Case
Chee Shet Khan @ Chu Set Kom v. Golden Elate Sdn Bhd & Ors
Tenaga Nasional Berhad v. Lto Injection Sdn Bhd
Syarikat Pembinaan Anggerik Sdn Bhd v. Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.