Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TAWFIQ AYMAN & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN ONE MENERUNG & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity determination for settlement agreement. (Para 1 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. challenges faced by the first defendant's appeal. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. guidelines for preliminary determination under o 33. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. statutory duties and ultra vires principles. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. res judicata and estoppel in settlement agreements. (Para 15 , 18) |
| 6. limits of estoppel against statutory duties. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. contract interpretation principles applied to settlement agreement. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. multiplicity of proceedings concerns. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. judicial economy through preliminary determinations. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. conditional legal determinations despite factual disputes. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 11. legislative purpose in statutory interpretation. (Para 31 , 32) |
| 12. court's reasoning and procedural directives. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
I. Introduction To The Application
[1] This appeal by the First Defendant is on my decision allowing Enc. 95 which is the Plaintiffs' application under O 33 r 2 of the Rules Of Court 2012 (ROC 2012) for specific questions arising in this action to be tried before the trial of the caus
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
