Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CHUA @ CHUA SWEE FONG – Appellant
Versus
TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of appeal regarding electricity meter tampering. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background facts about the electricity supply dispute. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. legal principles governing appellate discretion. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. validity of plaintiff's claim under electricity supply act. (Para 17 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. arguments regarding defendant's consumer status. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. determination of consumer status and related claims. (Para 26 , 27 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. conclusion to dismiss appeal with costs. (Para 32 , 34) |
(Appeal Against The Sessions Court's Decision)
Preliminary
[1] The 2nd Defendant (appellant) is appealing against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge who dismissed with costs the 2nd defendant's application to dispose of the case filed in the Sessions Court on a point of law under O 14A r 1 of the Rules of Court 2012 ("ROC 2012").
[2] This appeal relates to the claim that the plaintiff's (respondent) meter had been tampered with, resulting in revenue loss.
[3] The plaintiff's claim is primarily governed by the Electricity Supply Act 1990 as well as other factual and legal issues that wil
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
