Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
LOW WEE HENG – Appellant
Versus
MY US FOOD SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of tenancy agreement and occupation (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. defendant's triable issues raised during the summary judgment (Para 9 , 10 , 16 , 27) |
| 3. lack of evidence for renewal notice in july 2023 (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. standing of special damages claim in summary judgment (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 23) |
| 5. issuer's obligation under option to purchase clause (Para 30 , 31) |
| 6. plaintiff's standing to sue despite spa completion (Para 35) |
| 7. court’s final decisions on applications (Para 36) |
Introduction
[1] This suit involves a tenancy of a factory and office premises ("Premises") under a Tenancy Agreement between the parties dated 21-6-2012 ("Tenancy Agreement"). It was commenced at the Sessions Court in January 2024 and was transferred to High Court in May 2024.
[2] The Plaintiff (landlord), sued the Defendant (tenant) for vacant possession of the Premises and recovery of damages. The prayer for vacant possession was not pursued as the Defendant vacated the Premises in April 2024. The Defendant counterclaimed for a declaration that the termination of the tenancy was unlawful and sought damages for breach of two option clauses in the Tenancy Ag
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
