Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
ASIAN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE – Appellant
Versus
ONE AMERIN RESIDENCE SDN BHD & ORS AND ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to appeals and parties involved (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. background facts of the adjudication process (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. judicial review applications and high court's rulings (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. submissions by aiac regarding its immunities (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 5. counterarguments by one amerin against aiac's claims (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 6. analysis of legal immunity of international organizations (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 7. determination of aiac's immunities and actions (Para 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108) |
| 8. conclusion on aiac's immunity from review (Para 154 , 155 , 156) |
Introduction
[1] There are two appeals before us. In the first, the appellant is the Asian International Arbitration Centre ('the AIAC'), formerly known as the Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration ('the KLRCA'). The AIAC is an independent and supranational arbitral institution established in 1978 under the auspices of the Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization ('the AALCO').
[2] The 1st respondent is One Amerin Resi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
