HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TAN SRI DATO KAM WOON WAH & ORS – Appellant
Versus
DATO SRI ANDREW KAM TAI YEOW – Respondent
[1] To determine whether a litigant is a vexatious litigant is an unpleasant process, to say the least. Considerations must be made to the facts at hand that demonstrate repeated filing of suits on matter(s) already decided upon, which in turn, may conclude actions ill-favoured that they tantamount to habitual and persistent conduct. The declared vexatious litigant would thereafter not be allowed to commence any further legal suits save by leave of the court. Such an order shall be gazetted. For this case, such application stemmed from the unfortunate protracted legal drama between father and son that had flooded our superior courts since 2017.
[2] The 1st Plaintiff, the patriarch of the Kam family, together with 10 of the companies hereinafter referred to as the Raub Mining Development Company Sdn Bhd or RMDC Group, had filed this application by way of Originating Summons (OS) to declare his estranged son, the Defendant, a vexatious litigant. The 2nd Plaintiff (Raub Mining & Development Company Sdn Bhd or RMDC) wholly owns the 3rd Plaintiff (Raub Oil Mill Sdn Bhd or ROM). The 4th to 11th Plaintiffs collectively own approximately 90% of the RMDC, making the 4th to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.