Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
SUBBAIYAMMAH KANNA NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
TETUAN GEETHAN RAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. taxation of invoices as part of court proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of the solicitor-client relationship and invoices issued. (Para 4 , 12 , 15) |
| 3. details of the civil claims resulting from injury events. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. agreement on invoice tax processing. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. importance of documents presented during the taxation process. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 33 , 51) |
| 6. principles governing taxation of costs. (Para 66 , 72) |
| 7. cost responsibilities following taxation outcomes. (Para 163 , 164 , 170) |
[1] The Plaintiff and the Defendant have vide an Order of the High Court ("Consent Order") mutually agreed that invoices bearing nos 000417/012/2023 and 000417/012/2024 ("Previous Invoices"), both issued by the Defendant, be taxed before the Registrar of the High Court. Pursuant to the Consent Order, the matter proceeded to be heard before me.
[2] After hearing both parties, and having perused all the relevant cause papers and/or documents available before me or which that I have access to, I taxed and allowed an amount of RM55,882.00 being the total fees and disbursements vis-à-vis all works done and services provided by the Defendant,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
