SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 2619

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
CHAN – Appellant
Versus
SHAN & ORS; ALIR (INTERVENER) – Respondent


Evrol Mariette Peters J:

Introduction

[1] This was the Petitioner-Wife's divorce petition, seeking a divorce, spousal maintenance, and division of matrimonial assets, whilst the Respondent-Husband cross-petitioned for a divorce. The Petitioner also sought damages from the First and Second Co-Respondents for alleged adultery with the Respondent which the Petitioner claimed had caused the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.

[2] To protect the privacy of all parties involved in these proceedings and in consideration of the sensitivity of the issues at hand, the Petitioner and Respondent have been anonymised as "CHAN" and "SHAN," respectively. Similarly, the First and Second Co-Respondents have been anonymised as "RHAN" and "KHAN," respectively. The Intervener will be referred to as "ALIR" throughout this judgment.

The Factual Background

[3] This narrative follows a marriage that started off glamorous and exciting, filled with luxury and adventure. To everyone else, the couple seemed successful and happy, their relationship strengthened by wealth and shared experiences. But behind the scenes, cracks began to show as time passed. What once seemed like a perfect love story slowly started

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top