Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEMBAH KERJAYA SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
RIMBUN CORPORATE ADVISORY SDN BHD & ORS (ENCLS 32 87 120 122 12.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendants' applications to strike out plaintiff's claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. legal principles regarding striking out applications. (Para 31 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 3. arguments emphasizing lack of sufficient particulars in pleadings. (Para 54 , 56 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 4. issues of limitation periods for claims against deceased. (Para 73 , 81 , 82 , 84 , 88) |
| 5. defendants' breach of duty and causal relationships. (Para 94 , 100 , 102 , 109) |
| 6. conclusions on applications and orders for costs. (Para 120) |
(Enclosures 32, 87, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128 And 147 -Defendants' Striking Out Applications)
Introduction
[1] All the Defendants in this suit had filed applications to strike out the Plaintiffs' Writ and Statement of Claim ('SoC') dated 24 August 2023 pursuant to O 18, r 19(1) of the Rules of Court 2012 ('RC 2012').
[2] The applications by the 1st Defendant ('D1') to the 8th Defendant ('D8') (encls 120, 122, 124, 126, 128 and 87, respectively) were made under limbs (a) to (d) of O 18, r 19(1) RC 2012 while the application by the 5th Defendant ('D5') (encl 32) was made only under limb (a) of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
