A. Introduction

[1] The plaintiffs filed an application ("Plaintiffs' Application") to seek an order for identified documents and information (collectively, the "Information") to be treated in the manner as detailed in the Plaintiffs' Application. The Information is in exhibits "MH-37" and "MH-38" of the affidavit in support of the plaintiffs' application for an injunction ("Plaintiffs' Injunction Application").

[2] After considering the evidence before the court and hearing counsel's submissions, the court dismissed the Plaintiffs' Application. These are the grounds of the court's decision.

B. Background Facts

The Plaintiffs' Appointments As Agents Under The 4th Defendant

[3] The 2nd plaintiff is a shareholder and director of the 1st plaintiff. The plaintiffs are former takaful agents under the 4th defendant. They were appointed by way of the following agreements:

a. An agency agreement dated 18 December 2019, pursuant to which the 2nd plaintiff was appointed as an agent under the 4th defendant, responsible to promote and procure customers for the 4th defendant's takaful products;

b. An agency leader agreement dated 18 December 2019, pursuant to which the 2nd plaintif