FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
V MEDICAL SERVICES M SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
SWISSRAY ASIA HEALTHCARE CO LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conflict between winding-up and arbitration. (Para 1 , 2 , 8) |
| 2. lower threshold for arbitration disputes. (Para 3 , 11) |
| 3. existing tests for restraining winding-up petitions. (Para 4 , 6 , 12 , 72) |
| 4. genuine disputes require arbitration before winding-up. (Para 13 , 14 , 19 , 64 , 167) |
| 5. background facts of the case. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. order for fortuna injunction and arbitration reference. (Para 56 , 166) |
Introduction
[1] The evolution and expansion of commercial arbitration, globally, have brought to the fore conflicts between arbitration and other areas of the law. The present appeal relates to the tension between the winding-up process in insolvency and arbitration when the debt which comprises the basis for the winding-up petition is subject to an arbitration clause.
[2] In the instant case, the Appellant, V Medical Services (M) Sdn Bhd ('the Company') sought a Fortuna injunction to restrain Swissray Asia Healthcare Co Ltd ('Swissray') from bringing a winding-up petition on the grounds that there subsisted a dispute in relation to the debt which comprised the subject matter of the winding-up petition.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.