Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
MOHD NASIR JOHARI – Appellant
Versus
MYBURGERLAB SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reference from director general regarding dismissal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claimant's claim of forced resignation. (Para 4) |
| 3. claimant's position and job responsibilities. (Para 5) |
| 4. company's denial of forced resignation claims. (Para 6) |
| 5. role of industrial court and applicable law. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. burden of proof based on forced resignation. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 7. standard of proof and implications of resignation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 8. conflicting accounts of resignation circumstances. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 9. documents regarding resignation analyzed. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. two resignation letters indicating voluntary nature. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 11. mutual agreement regarding resignation. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 12. evidence undermining claim of coercion. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 13. nature of resignation emails and gratitude. (Para 42 , 43) |
| 14. dr. azizi's testimony regarding stress. (Para 44 , 45) |
| 15. court's analysis of voluntary resignation. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 16. conclusion regarding resignation as a result of negotiations. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 17. final conclusion on the claim of forced resignation. (Para 55) |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
