SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 3066

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
AMBANK (M) BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
TOP BUILDERS CAPITAL BERHAD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. winding-up petition premise and request for order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. indebtedness and statutory demand process. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. claims of non-receipt of cause papers. (Para 6 , 11)
4. assessment of proper service compliance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12)
5. analysis of statutory criteria for winding-up. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
Raja Rozela Raja Toran JC:

(Enclosure 1 - Petition)

Introduction

[1] This is a winding-up petition presented by AmBank (M) Berhad ["the Petitioner"] against Top Builders Capital Berhad ["the Respondent"], a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act 1965, now governed by the Companies Act 2016 (" CA 2016"). The Petition is premised on ss 464(1)(b), 465(1)(e), and 466(1)(a) of the 2016.

[2] The Petitioner seeks an order that the Respondent be wound up on the ground that it is unable to pay its debts, following its failure to comply with a statutory notice of demand issued under s 466(1)(a).

Factual Background

[3] The Respondent was indebted to the Petitioner under several banking facilities. The Petitioner obtained the following judgments:

• High Court Suit WA-22NCC-184-04/2022: Judgment dated 24 August 2022 for RM862,8

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top