HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
ICE MAN SDN BHD – Respondent
[Suit No: JA-22NCVC-38-03/2018]
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim filed for loss of revenue. (Para 1 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court decisions and appeals noted. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. details of meter tampering. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. plaintiff's loss and defendant's defenses. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. issues to be determined. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. witness testimonies on inspection. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. evidence of tampering found. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. details of tampering mechanisms. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 9. expert testimony assessed. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 10. challenges to plaintiff's evidence. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 11. defense arguments on cable usage. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 12. reliability of observation on tampering. (Para 48 , 49) |
| 13. assessment of expert witness independence. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 14. burden of proof on plaintiff. (Para 54 , 55) |
| 15. defendant's control of premises noted. (Para 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 16. consequences of defective statements. (Para 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78) |
| 17. requirement of compliance with evidence law. (Para 79 , 80 , 81 , 82) |
| 18. discussion on reasons for claim failure. (Para 83 , 84) |
| 19. methodology for loss calculation. (Para 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91) |
| 20. issues regarding the billing period. (Para 92 , 93 , 94) |
| 21. arguments regarding block ice plant usage. (Para 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99) |
| 22. assessment of loss calculation accuracy. (Para 100 , 101 , 102 , 103) |
| 23. federal court guidance on evidence. (Para 104 , 105 , 106) |
| 24. discussion on legal pleadings. (Para 107 , 108 , 109 , 110) |
| 25. conclusion drawn from legal arguments. (Para 111 , 112 , 113) |
| 26. addressing laches and res judicata. (Para 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118) |
| 27. final ruling on claims due to res judicata. (Para 119 , 120 , 121) |
| 28. conclusion: plaintiff's claim dismissed. (Para 126) |
Introduction
[1] This is a claim filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendant for loss of revenue amounting to RM2,346,906.87 with interest and cost due to the tampering of the meter installation at the Defendant's premises.
[2] After going through full trial, having read the parties' written submissions, and after having heard the oral submissions of the parties, I dismissed the Plaintiff's claim with costs of RM10,000.00 to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant.
[3] The Plaintiff has filed an appeal against part of the decision on quantum and costs whereas the Defendant has appealed against part of the decision on liability and also the decision of Justice Tuan Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz made on 10 August 2022 that allowed the Plaintiff's objection against the Defendant to produce additional documents during the trial. I note that the notice of appeal encompassing the decision of Justice Tuan Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz is incomplete and should have been filed separately by the Defendant.
[4] Below are the grounds of my decision and the grounds do not include the decision made by Justice Tuan Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz made on 10 August 2022.
Background
[5] The background facts in this suit are gathered from the cause papers and submissions filed by the parties and stated in chronological order.
[6] The trial commenced on 7 April 2021 until 14 August 2022 by Justice Tuan Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz. Following His Lordship's transfer to Kuala Lumpur High Court, I was instructed to take over and continue with the trial.
[7] The Plaintiff supplies electricity to the Defendant's ice factory at PTO 140216 and PTO 140216-1, Jalan Berjaya 8/1, Taman Perindustrian Berjaya, Jalan Kempas Lama, 81200 Johor Bahru, Johor registered under the account number 0340 00753047 7 and 0340 00753049 03 respectively.
[8] The Plaintiff carried out an inspection on the meter installation at the Defendant's factory on 21 March 2012 and discovered that the armoured cable at room No 140216 ("MSB1") and No 140216-1 ("MSB2") at Jalan Berjaya 8/1,81200 Kempas Lama, Johor were tampered whereby S1 and S2 wires for all phases of red, yellow and blue after the Terminal Current Transformer (CT)
Tenaga Nasional Berhad v. Dunia Raya Enterprise Sdn Bhd
Thomas Thomas @ Mohan K Thomas v. Tenaga Nasional Berhad
Sampo Materials (M) Sdn Bhd v. Tenaga Nasional Berhad
Tenaga Nasional Berhad v. Karun Klasik Sdn Bhd
Tenaga Nasional Berhad v. Ichi-ban Plastic (M) Sdn Bhd & Other Appeals
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.