PJ MIDTOWN DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD vs ASIANLAND REALTY SDN BHD & ANOR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Petitioner Advocates:Alan Tan Fu Seng ,Respondent Advocate: Goh Keng Tat,Elfeez Thariq

Table of Content
1. introduction of applications by pj midtown. (Para 1)
2. application outcomes for the applications. (Para 2)
3. factual background of agreements and obligations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 12)
4. details of non-payment and notice of demand. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
5. pj midtown's key arguments in summary judgment application. (Para 14 , 15 , 20)
6. asialand's defenses and counterarguments. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 21)
7. oyo my's arguments against liability. (Para 22 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 29)
8. court's analysis of the nature of the tenancy. (Para 31 , 32 , 39 , 42 , 43)
9. court emphasis on valid legal obligations. (Para 41 , 48 , 49)
10. interrelation of enclosures and procedural aspects. (Para 63 , 64 , 73)
11. procedural requirements for counterclaims under roc. (Para 75 , 76 , 79)
12. court's ruling on arbitration and procedural integrity. (Para 88 , 90 , 91)
13. examination of amendment's validity under roc. (Para 93 , 96 , 101)
14. summary of final judgment and orders. (Para 108)

Wan Muhammad Amin Wan Yahya J:

[1] This Judgment is in respect of the following applications filed by the respective parties:

(i) Enclosure 19: the Plaintiff's, PJ Midtown Development Sdn Bhd ("PJ Midtown"),