Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT IPOH
MOHAMED HAZLAN MOHAMED HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis for claimant's constructive dismissal (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. company’s refutation of claimant's claims (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. function of the industrial court's inquiry (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. legal standards for constructive dismissal (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. burden of proof in dismissal cases (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. verification of claimant’s employment status (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 7. nature of breach impacting employment (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 8. fundamental breach due to salary non-payment (Para 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 9. judgement regarding unjust dismissal (Para 67 , 68 , 69) |
| 10. financial remedies ordered by the court (Para 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76) |
[1] This is a reference made by the Director General of Industrial Relations Malaysia dated 21 March 2022 pursuant to s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 which was received by the industrial Court on 28 March 2022 arising out of the alleged constructive dismissal of Mohamed Hazlan Bin Mohamed Hussain (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") against Velocity Technology Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") on 2 September 2021.
Factual Background
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
