Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
SECURE PLANTATIONS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PEJABAT TANAH DAN GALIAN NEGERI PULAU PINANG & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of land law caveats (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details on agreements and payments (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. procedural developments and ownership disputes (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. arguments presented by the parties (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. legal standards for registrar's caveat (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 6. legal standards for private caveats (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 7. determining caveatable interest (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 8. balance of convenience considerations (Para 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71) |
| 9. private caveat by r3 analyzed (Para 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76) |
Introduction
[1] In the Torren System regulating land law in Malaysia, the entry of a caveat on land titles is common place. It is also very common for aggrieved parties to then seek the removal of such caveats. This was one such case.
[2] The Plaintiff in this current proceedings is seeking to remove two private caveats lodged by the 2nd and 3rd Respondents (hereinafter referred to as "R2" and "R3") respectively as well as a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
