HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
LAU KOK GUAN @ LOW KOK GUAN – Appellant
Versus
CHEAH CHIA HSING – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defamation action filed with counterclaims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. factual background of pupillage and complaints. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. caveat lodged affecting petition for admission. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. demands for damages and defamation claims. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. issue of res judicata and estoppel discussed. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. consideration on accessing court and avoiding abuse. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 7. defamation claim requirements established. (Para 44 , 54 , 57 , 59 , 75) |
| 8. qualified privilege applied in defamation context. (Para 58 , 67 , 70) |
| 9. conspiracy claims need explicit facts. (Para 77 , 78 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83) |
| 10. requirements for proving abuse of process. (Para 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91) |
| 11. no causal link in counterclaim established. (Para 94 , 96 , 99 , 101) |
| 12. claims and counterclaims dismissed. (Para 103 , 104) |
Introduction
[1] This is a defamation action filed by the Plaintiff ("P") against the Defendant ("D") and a counterclaim by D for tort of abuse of process against P.
[2] At the end of the trial, after having heard counsel for both
Kerajaan Malaysia v. Mat Shuhaimi Shafiei
Cubic Electronic Sdn Bhd v. MKC Corporate & Business Advisory Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal
Malaysia Building Society Bhd v. Tan Sri General Ungku Nazaruddin Ungku Mohamed
Raub Australian Gold Mining Sdn Bhd v. Hue Shieh Lee
Letchumi Thasan & Ors v. Subramaniam Muniandy
Deepak Jaikishan Jaikishan Rewachand & Anor v. Intrared Sdn Bhd & Anor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.