HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
AMY SIEW PITT WEN & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
MINES WATERFRONT BUSINESS PARK SDN BHD; GRAND WELLNESS HUB SDN BHD (APPL.... – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Enclosure 16)
Introduction
[1] This is my decision in respect of encl 16, which is an application by the Proposed Interveners - namely Ling How Gin, Yap Chye Cheey, Jogindar Singh Sardara Singh, and Oralix Marketing Sdn Bhd - for leave to intervene in these post-winding up proceedings pursuant to O 15 r 6 of the Rules of 2012 and/or the inherent jurisdiction of the Court . I delivered my oral decision allowing the application on 25 March 2025. These are my written grounds.
Background
[2] The Respondent company, Mines Waterfront Business Park Sdn Bhd ("the Company"), was ordered to be wound up on 9 May 2023. On 6 September 2024, Andrew Heng and Kumarakuru of Baker Tilly Insolvency PLT were appointed as joint and several liquidators of the Company, replacing the Official Receiver.
[3] The current proceedings (BA-28PW-260-09/2024) were initiated by a contributory, Grand Wellness Hub Sdn Bhd ("the Applicant"), seeking to stay and/or terminate the winding-up of the Company.
[4] The Proposed Interveners, who assert themselves as creditors of the Company and who were instrumental in securing the appointment of the private liquidators (vide. BA-28PW-269-10/20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.