Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
Mohd Arief Emran Arifin, J
LEE BEE SUN – Appellant
Versus
SIEW SEOW KIM & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. minority oppression claim details (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. alleged oppression acts described (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. defendants' denial of wrongdoing (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. applicable law on minority oppression (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. plaintiff's claims lack foundation (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 6. court's evaluation of alleged oppressive acts (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 7. access to company management rights (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 8. rejection of claims due to insufficient evidence (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
(Originating Summons — Minority Oppression Claim)
A.Introduction
Summary Of The Plaintiff's Claim
[1] The Plaintiff claims that the actions of the 1st and 2nd defendants have been oppressive or have unlawfully disregarded her interests as a shareholder of the Company. She argues that there has been a visible departure from the standards of fair dealing, and that the actions of the 1st and 2nd defendants sufficiently violate these standards, constituting a breach of fair play. Therefore, she now seek
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
