SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 4140

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PETRONAS LUBRICANTS MARKETING (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
RIGAZ SDN BHD (ENCL 1) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ahmad Murad Abdul Aziz J:

Introduction

[1] Enclosure 1 is a Petition to wind up the Respondent pursuant to s 465(1)(e) read with s 466(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2016 (CA 2016). This petition is premised on the failure by the Respondent to settle a judgment sum after the expiry of 21 days from service of a statutory notice under s 466(1)(a) of the Companies Act 2016 on the Respondent.

Background Facts

[2] The Petitioner obtained a judgment against the Respondent in Suit No WA-22NCC-549-10/2022 on 13 April 2023 ("the Judgment"). The Judgment is for the sum of RM4,400,298.75 together with interest and costs.

[3] Till the date of hearing of this Petition, the Respondent has not filed any appeal against the Judgment.

[4] The Petitioner issued and served a notice pursuant to s 466(1)(a) of the CA 2016 ("Statutory Notice") on the Respondent on 8 June 2023 demanding payment of the Judgment sum within 21 days of service of the Statutory Notice.

[5] Upon expiry of the 21 days and the failure by the Respondent to pay the Judgment sum, the Petitioner filed this Petition.

The Law

[6] It is trite law that a failure by the Respondent to pay the sums demanded under the statutory notice will trigge


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top