SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 4431

HIGH COURT MALAYA MELAKA
COSTWIN CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TEH CHONG PING & ANOTHER CASE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anselm Charles Fernandis J:

Introduction

[1] This judgment is in respect of 2 Originating Summonses. They are:

(a) MA-24C-1-02/2023 is Costwin Constructions Sdn Bhd's ("Costwin") application to set aside the adjudication decision dated 25 January 2023 ("the AD") which was held in favour of CJV Trading Enterprise ("CJV"). This application is made pursuant to s 15(b) and s 15(d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ("CIPAA 2012"). (Costwin's setting aside application).

(b) MA-24C-3-04/2023 which is CJV's enforcement application to enforce the AD pursuant to s 28 CIPAA 2012 (CJV's enforcement application).

[2] Costwin's setting aside application and CJV's enforcement application will collectively be referred to as "the applications". Parties agreed that the applications be heard together.

[3] After hearing submissions by both parties I decided to dismiss Costwin's setting aside application and allow CJV's enforcement application. Costwin has appealed to the Court of Appeal against both decisions.

Brief Background

[4] Sometime in May 2019 CJV had been requested by Costwin to supply temporary sheet piles for an ongoing project called "Design and Construction,


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top