COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AZMAN TEH – Appellant
Versus
CHONG SHAO FEN & ANOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] The Respondents/Plaintiffs' bungalow at 50 Jalan Taman Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, was damaged by demolition/construction works carried out by their neighbours in 2009.
[2] They sued their neighbours (the 1st and 2nd Defendants) and their neighbours' architect, contractor, and consultant engineer (the 3rd, 4th and 5th Defendants) for negligence.
[3] The litigation has a long and chequered history but the appeal before us is by the 5th Defendant/Appellant alone.
[4] The appeal is against the decision of the learned HCJ Nik Hasmat Binti Nik Mohamad J on 1 November 2023.
[5] The learned HCJ had allowed the Plaintiffs' claim for reassessment of damages against the 5th Defendant with costs of RM5,000.00 subject to payment of the allocatur fee, as follows:
i. loss of rental/loss of use of the bungalow - RM2,171,570.00
ii. repair and rectification of the bungalow - RM1,171,012.00
iii. aggravated and/or exemplary damages - RM300,000.00
[6] The learned HCJ did not allow the claims for mental distress and hardship, and costs of moving back to the bungalow.
[7] The guiding principle in an appeal against a reassessment of damages is that there ought not to be any app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.