SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 4237

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LEE TIN HUI – Appellant
Versus
GL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Fiona Bodipalar,Pan Shan Ping ,Respondent Advocate: Lau Kee Sern,Eunice Aw Shze Xian

JUDGMENT

Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad J:

Introduction

[1] Before the court is an oppression action under s 346 of the Companies Act 2016 brought by a minority shareholder against the majority shareholder- directors of a family-owned investment holding company. At issue are allegations of oppressive conduct including substantial interest-free loans taken by directors without proper approval, payment of excessive remuneration, non-declaration of dividends, and failure to provide information or hold meetings — all allegedly designed to benefit the majority at the expense of minority interests. The case requires examination of the distinction between corporate wrongs and genuine oppression, the legal requirements governing directors' loans and remuneration in private companies, and the obligations directors owe to shareholders regarding corporate governance and transparency.

Background Facts

[2] The 1st Defendant, GL Property Management Sdn Bhd ("the Company"), was incorporated on 2 August 1984 as an investment holding company. The Company owns one property located at No 72, Ground Floor, 1st Floor, 2nd Floor and 3rd Floor, Jalan SS2/67, 47300 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, from which it derives

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top