SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 3851

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
DELICATE BUILDERS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
INTIGA SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Jerome Lee Hui Ming,Eric Liaw Ming Kok ,Respondent Advocate: Andrew Davis,Anne Raj

JUDGMENT

Aliza Sulaiman J:

[1] This was an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge ('SCJ') made on 25 August 2023 in:

(a) allowing the respondent's claim for the sum of RM172,719.62 with interest at the rate of 5% per annum on the said sum from the date of filing of the Writ of Summons until the date of full settlement and costs of RM6,000.00; and

(b) dismissing the appellant's counterclaim for the sum of RM360,691.17 with costs of RM1,000.00.

[2] After having considered the Record of Appeal and the comprehensive written submissions of the parties and the Common Scott Schedule (encl 22), including the oral clarification by the learned counsels who represented the parties, I allowed the appeal only in respect of subparagraph 1(a) above whereby the amount allowed following the appeal was RM103,769.22 with interest at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of filing of the Writ of Summons until full settlement.

[3] The appellant is aggrieved by my decision. These are my full grounds of judgment ('GoJ') for purposes of the appellant's appeal to the Court of Appeal.

[4] The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as they were in the Court below.

S


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top