SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 4112

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
EUM REALTY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
INTER FORMULA (M) SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Tee Xue Ying ,Respondent Advocate: Khabir Saroop Singh Dhillon

JUDGMENT

Choong Yeow Choy JC:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by EUM Realty Sdn Bhd, the Third Defendant in the Sessions Court , pursuant to O 55 r 5 of the Rules of 2012, against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge in dismissing its application in encl 19 with costs in the cause.

[2] Enclosure 19 at the Sessions Court was premised on O 33 r 2 and/or O 15 r 6 and/or O 18 r 19(1) of the Rules of 2012.

The Appellant had sought the following in its application in encl 19:

• Bahawa soalan dan/atau isu yang tertimbul daripada tindakan Plaintif didengar atau dilupuskan dan/atau dibicarakan terlebih dahulu sebagai isu preliminary sebelum pendengaran isu-isu dan/atau soalan-soalan lain tindakan Plaintif menurut Aturan 33 Kaedah 2 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012; dan

• Mahkamah memberikan perintah yang sesuai berkenaan dengan keputusan yang didapati daripada pendengaran isu di permohonan ini;

• Bahawa D3 dikeluarkan sebagai salah satu Defendan-Defendan dan/atau diberikan kebenaran untuk menarik diri daripada tindakan ini berdasarkan antara lain A 15 k 6 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012; dan

• Bahawa Writ Saman dan Pernyataan Tuntutan bertarikh 8 December 2023 dibatalkan terhadap D3.

The


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top