HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
THEOW SAY KOW @ TEOH KIANG SENG HENRY – Appellant
Versus
TEOH KHIAN GUAN & ORS – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] By way of encl 6 dated 6 May 2025, the Plaintiff ("P") applied to be appointed as administrator pendente lite for the estate of his late mother ("estate"), pending the determination of this action. Alternatively for the appointment of any other eligible individual, including accountants or any solicitors representing any of the parties herein, as administrator pendente lite of the estate. Enclosure 6 is made under s 19 of the Probate and Administration Act 1959 and O 72 r 18 and r 20 of the Rules of 2012.
[2] On 14 August 2025, I dismissed encl 6. Here are the grounds of my decision.
Enclosure 6
[3] In encl 6, P seeks the following reliefs:
"2) THEOW SAY KOW @ TEOH KIANG SENG, Plaintif dilantik tanpa memberikan jaminan dan / atau bon pentadbiran, sebagai Pentadbir Pendente Lite (administrator pendente lite) harta pusaka mendiang Tan Sai Hong (No. K/P: 380424-07-5020) (selepas ini dirujuk sebagai "harta pusaka tersebut") sementara menunggu penentuan tindakan Probet di atas atau sehingga perintah selanjutnya Mahkamah ini;
3) Secara alternatifnya, mana-mana individu yang berkelayakan termasuk akauntan atau mana-mana peguam cara yang mewaki
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.