SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 3923

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PERINTIS GEMILANG SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CHEE BEE GAIK & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ramesh Lachman ,Respondent Advocate: Khong Jin Teong

JUDGMENT

Gan Techiong JC:

Introduction

[1] The Plaintiff has filed this action, by way of a writ of summons, against four defendants in December 2024. The 4th Defendant is an advocate & solicitor. Some four months later in April 2025, the Plaintiff filed an application pursuant to O 15 r 6 Rules of 2012 for leave to add two advocates & solicitors, who are partners of the same law firm as the 4th Defendant, as the 5th Defendant and 6th Defendant respectively. The existing defendants objected to the Plaintiff's application.

[2] After reading the cause papers and hearing submissions of counsel, I decided that this Court ought to exercise its discretion to allow the Plaintiff's said application to add Kursiah Sharmini binti Hassan as the 5th Defendant and Solahuddin bin Zainal Ariffin as the 6th Defendant. They are both partners of the existing 4th Defendant practising law under the name of Messrs. Sulaimi, Sharmini & Partners.

The Plaintiff's Submissions

[3] The Plaintiff adduced as evidence a letter dated 2 February 2024 issued by the Bar Council which confirms that the proposed defendants are partners of the same law firm as the 4th Defendant, ie Messrs. Sulaimi, Sharmini & Partners.

[4


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top