SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 4421

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
NG ZE XUAN – Appellant
Versus
TAN SING HOW & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Bryan Ho Jiann Yau,Siew Kai Hwei,Kimberly Ng Wenn Mei ,Respondent Advocate: Pung Jenn Jiang

JUDGMENT

Jamhirah Ali J:

Introduction

[1] The Plaintiff's claim is based on allegations of defamation against the Defendants, arising from seven (7) defamatory statements in nine (9) publications made by the respective Defendants against the Plaintiff.

[2] The Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, as well as general, aggravated, and exemplary damages.

[3] The Defendants filed a counterclaim for breach of contract, seeking the return of commissions and bonuses paid to the Plaintiff.

Brief Facts

The Plaintiff's Case

[4] In April 2019, the Plaintiff joined the 3rd defendant, Kalysta, as a sales representative and quickly rose through the ranks. Within Kalysta, sales representatives are organised into groups known as "families", each led by a leader.

[5] The Plaintiff co-founded and led the "SOULUV" group, which achieved top sales for 2019 and 2020, making her Kalysta's highest-ranked sales representative with a team of over 400 members.

[6] However, on 26 June 2021, her role as a sales representative for Kalysta was abruptly terminated.

WeChat Group 1 And WeChat Group 3

[7] On 16 July 2021, at around 10:25 pm., the 1st defendant published or facilitated the publication of a message in two Kalysta sa




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top