COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BUDGET MARINE LIMITED & ORS – Appellant
Versus
ASTIMEWA SDN BHD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A. Background
[1] We shall refer to parties as they were in the High Court .
[2] The Plaintiff company (Plaintiff) is in the business of selling scrap metal.
[3] The Plaintiff entered into an agreement dated 1 January 2015 with Southern Steel Bhd (SSB) wherein the plaintiff sold scrap metal to SSB [Sale Agreement (Plaintiff-SSB)].
[4] The 1st Defendant company (1st Defendant) owns-
(1) a dumb barge, "Budget 21" (Barge); and
(2) a tugboat, "Budget 11" (Tugboat).
This Judgment shall refer to the Barge and Tugboat collectively as the "2 Vessels".
[5] The 2 Vessels are managed and operated by the 3rd Defendant company (3rd Defendant).
[6] The 2nd Defendant company (2nd Defendant) was the former owner of the 2 Vessels and was named as the carrier of the cargo in the two bills of lading issued in this case (2 Bills of Lading). The contents of the 2 Bills of Lading are similar. Three clauses of the 2 Bills of Lading are relevant in this case, namely:
(1) cl 5(2) [cl 5(2) (2 Bills of Lading)] provided as follows, among others-
"The Merchant [Plaintiff] undertakes that no claim or allegation shall be made against any person or Vessel whatsoever, other than the carrier [2nd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.