SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 4219

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
NADARAJAH LINGAM SINNADURAI & ORS – Appellant
Versus
DATO SRI DR SURESH RAJ LACHMANAN & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Suzana Muhamad Said JC:

(Enclosure 111)

Introduction

[1] This is the Plaintiffs' application pursuant to O 34 r 2(4) and O 92 r 4 of the Rules of 2012 (ROC 2012) to reinstate their action that was struck out for non-compliance of an Unless Order (encl 111).

[2] This Court dismissed encl 111. The reasons are as deliberated.

Brief Facts

[3] The Plaintiffs commenced this action against the Defendants for tort of negligence arising from the demise of Madam Shanti A/P Ponnudurai (Deceased)in their personal capacity & claimed for psychiatric injuries due to the demise of the Deceased.

[4] The Deceased was the wife of the First Plaintiff and the mother of the Second, Third and Fourth Plaintiffs.

[5] The Deceased was under the treatment and care of the Defendants from 12 August 2016 to 28 August 2016.

[6] The case was called for several case managements, where this Court had instructed for parties to comply with pre-trial case management (PTCM) directions.

[7] On 27 March 2024,an unless order for compliance of the PTCM documents was given by this Court , that all PTCM documents to be filed on or before 19 April 2024. In the event the said PTCM documents were not filed, the claim and/or


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top