SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 4057

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
RIN – Appellant
Versus
MIN & ANOR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Evrol Mariette Peters J:

Introduction

[1] This is the Respondent-husband's application in encl 31 ("this Application") for, among others, parties to be anonymised.

[2] Prior to the disposal of this Application, and during its case management stage, the Petitioner-wife, Respondent and Co-Respondent had, in the interim, already been anonymised as RIN, MIN and VIN respectively.

The Factual Background

[3] The Petitioner, and Respondent (collectively "the Parties"), both Malaysian citizens, were aged 54 and 66 respectively at the time of the hearing of this Application. They were married in January 1998, and had two children ("the Children"), born in 2003 and 2006 respectively.

[4] The marriage was unable to withstand the test of time and after allegations of adultery made by the Petitioner, she filed a divorce petition in April 2024, naming the Co-Respondent as a party to the matrimonial dispute.

[5] Although the Respondent filed his reply in September 2024, he had, prior to that, in June 2024, filed this Application seeking the following reliefs:

(1) That the names, addresses, details and any evidence whether oral or documentary relating to these proceedings likely to lead to the iden


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top