COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AFEEF ABDULQADER MANSOOR – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH WPKL – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the appellant/applicant against the decision of the High Court dated 3 August 2022 whereby the learned High Court Judge ("the learned HCJ") had dismissed the appellant's land reference for the acquisition of the land known as Lot 25900, Mukim Setapak, Kuala Lumpur ("scheduled land").
[2] At the High Court , the appellant seeks additional compensation for the market value of the house and supposed injurious affection owing to the loss of the building and numerous chattels erected on the said scheduled land. Aggrieved by the decision of the High Court , hence this appeal.
[3] We heard the appeal on 30 May 2025 and we now give our decision. For ease of reference, parties will be referred to as they were in the High Court . The Appellant will be referred to as the applicant and the respondent, Pentadbir Tanah Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur will be referred to as the Land Administrator.
Background Facts
[4] At all material times, it is not disputed that the building on the scheduled land was demolished in 2012 after severely affected by the collapse of a concrete embankment in Bukit Setiawangsa due to a landslide and i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.