JUDGMENT

(Enclosures 3, 12, 14 and 37)

Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah J:

Preliminary

[1] A dispute has arisen over the right to operate a car park in a building. On this matter, there is a claim by the plaintiff that the defendants renewed their contract to operate the car park for another term. The contract was later broken, says the plaintiff. The defendants dispute this claim, claiming the contract expired and that the second defendant did not renew it.

[2] A total of four (4) interlocutory applications are before the court. They are as follows:

(a) The first is encl 3. Enclosure 3 is the plaintiffs application for an inter partes injunction prohibiting the defendants from executing any contract to operate the car park with third parties until the final disposal of this case.

(b) Secondly, there is encl 12 which is the application filed by the first defendant to set aside the ex parte order issued by this court on 30 October 2024 which was then extended by an ad-interim order.

(c) Thirdly and similarly to encl 12, Enclosure 37 represents the application to set aside the injunction by the second defendant.

(d) Finally, encl 14 is the first defendant's application to strike out the plaintiffs