SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 4809

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TRILLION OSCAR SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TIMUR ENTERPRISE SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:John Wong,Chua Jeung Ru ,Respondent Advocate: Cheryl Tay,Liao Jia Wen

JUDGMENT

Mohd Arief Emran Arifin J:

A. Introduction

[1] This Court decided to hear the following enclosures on the 27 March 2025 :-

(i) Enclosure 15 - The application by Su Ming Jiun to be added as an intervener in this application. He also seeks to stay these proceedings pending the claim filed by him in the Writ Summons No: BA-22NCC-153-12/2022.

(ii) Enclosure 1 - Petition to Wind-Up the Respondent based on the Winding Up Notice issued and the Judgment in the Civil Suit No: WA-22NCC-681-09/2023 dated 10 July 2024.

B. Decision Of This Court

[2] This Court found that the Applicant / Proposed Intervener did not have any locus standi to appear in these proceedings to object to the application to wind-up the Respondent. Therefore, the application was dismissed with costs.

[3] This Court also found that as the Petitioner has shown that the Respondent is insolvent based on the failure to comply with the demand issued in the statutory notice as well as the failure to pay the judgment sums claimed, the said Respondent should be wound up.

C. Reasoning For Dismissing Enclosure 15 - Intervention And Stay Of Proceedings

Application To Intervene

Facts Raised To Justify Right To Intervene

[4] Su Mi


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top